Electronic
voting is usually seen as a means for making the electoral process more resourceful.
E-voting solutions can amplify the safety of the ballot; boost up the dispensation
of results and make voting easier.
Types of E-Voting:
Direct Recording Electronics (DRE)
E-voting which is actually administrated by representatives of governmental or
independent electoral establishment e.g. electronic voting machines located at
polling stations. Distant e-Voting voting is performed within the voter's solitary
power, and is not physically administrated by governmental authorities e.g.
voting from one's PC, cell phone, TV via the internet (also called e-voting or
Remote E-Voting)
Restricted Environments
Seen as the electronic corresponding of customary paper-based voting in polling
stations, Unrestricted Environments occurs without any direction and from
voting devices that cannot be restricted by the election administration.
Strengths of E-Voting
- Quicker vote calculation and indexing
- More precise results as miscalculation is debarred
- Proficient management of knotty electoral systems
- Enhanced appearance of difficult ballot papers
- Better handiness for voters
- Automatic increased contribution and churn out
- Additional accustomed to the needs of a gradually more itinerant society
- Frauds in polling stations, transmission and tabulation are prevented as the human interaction is reduced to maximum level
- Augmented convenience
- Chance of different language user interfaces that can provide a different language electorate improved than paper ballots
- Possible durable cost investments through savings in poll worker time
Weaknesses of E-Voting
- Requisite of lucidity
- Restricted sincerity and accepting of the system for non-experienced
- Need to have settled principles for e-voting systems
- Probable contravention of the confidentiality of the vote
- Enlarged communications and ecological rations
- Augmented safety rations for defending the voting system in Pakistan
- Compact echelon of run by the election administration
- Partial narrate promises
- Incomplete hold up for immobilize voters
- Requirement for additional voter education movement
- Likely variance with the accessible legal framework
Future in Pakistan
- Facing a concern of having genuine democracy
- Pakistan’s initial step towards e-voting is to substantiate the voters
- ECP done door to door verification
- World’s largest voter confirmation is initiated through SMS
EVM Solutions
- The organism aims at ensuring lucidity and bogus elections
- Electronic thumb confirmation of each voter shall be done at the own polling station EVM Structure
- Voter recognition Unit
- Vote Casting Unit
- Result Management Unit
Weaknesses that Pakistan not
overcome
- Need of simplicity
- Need to have settled principles for e-voting systems
- No Paper review trace
- Reduced level of control by the election administration because of high vendor- and/or technology-dependence
- Omitted hold up for disable voters
- Need for extra voter education movement possible conflict with the existing legal framework
By working on weaknesses I am sure that E-voting will help in removing corruption in elections, As we saw the biggest bogus General Elections in 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment